While we can live with and respect one another's views on life, what should be taught in public school? Should efforts be made to find common ground and then form a curriculum around just those common principles? Then there is the question of who will sufficiently represent everyone in order to create that curriculum? A Christian-based math program will often times try to influence its principles through story problems. Another science program may give a couple sentences to creationism and dedicate 2 whole chapters to the big-bang theory. Not even math and science are left on neutral ground.
Perhaps just as there are different views of life, there should also be schools that teach different principle sets. I guess that's what a private school is. That way a child's education isn't so watered down trying to represent every possible view on life that exists. If public schools became in essence a private school sponsored by the government, education suppliers should enjoy that! With the diminishing use of public schools and their common curricula determined by the government, educational materials would become more and more diverse. New private schools would continue to be established and the requests for new materials would provide a good opportunity to make some money!
Where would that leave the government in terms of what it thinks it's responsibility is for education? Perhaps their job should be to ensure that the next generation knows how government is run and encourage civic involvement at all levels, starting with local community government. What purposes are realized by a government that regulates education? It is not likely that the reason is to blatantly subdue and repress the next generation so that a select group of individuals retain power for themselves. Most likely, intentions are genuinely to do good.
But again, what is 'good'? The definition for 'good' as defined by our country collectively is becoming more ambiguous all the time. I think we still all agree that killing someone is bad, but abortion, water rights, and marriage do not have a common consensus. These particular disagreements have existed for a long time, but the number of other disagreements continue to grow by leaps and bounds. And common ground is becoming more scarce.
Getting back to the motives of the government-regulated education... perhaps the government wants to ensure there is a middle class to keep the economy thriving. May be the government wants to help America rise in its standings of scientific discovery. What ever the true motives are, no matter how altruistic they may be, it becomes a very difficult challenge for government leadership to adequately and accurately regulate the public school system across the country.
I've often times considered the pros and cons there are to J and I homeschooling our children. I don't necessarily think that our own children's education is superior to what is being taught by some fabulous teachers in the public or private school systems. Our reasons for home-schooling can be summed up in two points. First we feel inspired that we should home school our children. Next, I firmly believe that ultimately, it is parents who are responsible for providing the opportunities for their children's education -- public, private or homeschool.
It is, perhaps, more the feeling of my own parental responsibility that encourages us to continue homeschooling. Perhaps it's the fear of Facism or Orwell's "1982". I don't want to feel that I'm simply giving away all my parental influence to the any external school system. If the school supports and teaches principles similar to those I believe in, then it should be an educational tool I can use to teach my children. While I hope my kids won't be exactly like me, I do hope to pass on what I feel are important principles of life to live by. I don't believe that public school really gives a flying hoot about the principles I live by; with so many different principle sets in existence, how could they?
This Earth life is precious and fleeting. We are not all the same. Each person adds something beneficial for everyone else. If we're all forced through a meat grinder, assembly-line education, we will all be missing out. Thank goodness for dreamers and creative-minds. Thank goodness for the individuals who are technically minded, even if they may not have much of an imagination. Thank goodness for the people-persons. And thank goodness for the teachers who must balance the red tape of the public school system with the desire to truly help young minds learn how to learn.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Location:N Krotik Ct,Atwater,United States